Trending
Yes, lake health is important, but...
To the editor:
I am responding to Gregg Paulson's "Lake health and pickleball?" editorial on Thursday the 13th.
First, the city council must do both. They are both part of the community's well-being. However, the importance of lake health is paramount.
His account of DNR approval was not factual, according to the DNR's head of aeration. That said, there is much I agree with.
The city had aerators in Budd Lake but found that they did not improve water quality sufficiently. In a way, the proposed nano-bubblers are just aerators on steroids. Because the new technology produces such small bubbles, the aeration is increased and doesn't dissipate. The new technology is radically different, radically improved. Will it be practical given the size of our lakes?
For more information about the pros and cons of aeration and emerging technology, visit https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/lakeaeration/index.html
A year ago, I attended a presentation by Easy Automation and was impressed. I am not confident about the benefits, costs and consequences of this new technology at scale. Since the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) just approved the technology for testing only - not deployment - they aren't sure either. They must think it has potential to spend time testing.
A low-cost, definitive study might put us on a faster path for cleaner lakes, and it might give a local manufacturer a critical boost, resulting in jobs and taxes.
Citizens, Easy Automation and the DNR should work with city and county officials to help everyone understand positive aspects and risks of the technology via direct interaction. This could mean a town hall meeting with all concerned. It should be done sooner than later because the health benefit for us and the lakes may be significant. Perhaps this meeting could be setup at the next city meeting on the 24th.
Ted Schaefer
Fairmont